Enhancing Core Teaching Skills with Technology Scoring Rubric for ePortfolio
5
3
1
Score
Wikispace structure
All ePortfolio components present and linked properly, with template contents properly pasted in.
Wiki includes home page, pages for all standards, bibliography, and navigation bar.
Table of Contents on each page.
Evidence apparent throughout the wiki of use of wiki tools such as linking, adding images, formatting text, addition of tables, embedding media, etc.
Structure complete with some missing elements such as the bibliography or Table of Contents, or problems with navigation.
Wiki is attractive, and used basic text editing only.
Many problems with structure and navigation.
Some difficulty evident with wiki editing and “look” or wiki.
3
Home Page
All elements present.
Introduction of self includes rich information about the creator.
All elements present.
Some information about creator.
Missing elements.
5
Home Page: Introduction
Overall reflection on ePortfolio and Integration Plan includes rich description of achievement of NETS for teachers and shows insight into the relationship to the student NETS standards.
Includes references to competencies achieved for each module.
Reflection includes references to course materials, but no in-depth analysis. Little thought put into making the connection between NETS student and teacher standards.
Very brief reflection. No indication of deep thought in reflecting on learning. Competencies minimally addressed.
5
Home Page: Goal
Well developed goal(s) set at the beginning of the course that referenced the results of the survey and to the frameworks on the LoTi site.
At end of course, achievements listed and explained with examples. References to frameworks included in setting clear goals for next steps given.
Goal(s) stated clearly. Some reference to information gleaned from survey and LoTi site.
At end of course, some achievements listed, but only some deep thought evident.
Includes goal statement, but not very clearly. No reference to LoTi survey or their place in the steps of the frameworks.
At end of course, little connection made between course work and next steps in setting goals.
5
Home Page: Integration Plan
Upoaded successfully in a file format that others can read.
Uploaded successfully with reminder needed concerning file format.
Not uploaded successfully, but delivered in some other way such as email.
5
Cross-reference Page
A standard is indicated for each activity. Links connect the activity with the standard.
A standard is indicated for each activity.
An attempt was made to indicate a standard for each activity but not all are included.
5
Standards: Criteria for all standards
Each standard addressed in-depth. Appropriate artifacts from the course assignments listed with links enabled.
In-depth reflection on how each artifact demonstrated how the standard was met.
Clear goals set for future learning related to each standard.
Most standards addressed in some way.
Some artifacts from course assignments missing. Some links missing so artifact is un-viewable.
Perfunctory goals set although some standards have well-thought-out goals.
Little evidence of artifacts from course assignments included. Brief and superficial reflections on how standards were met.
Goals were not well thought out, and have little possibility of being met.
NA
Standard 1
5
Standard 2
5
Standard 3
5
Standard 4
5
Standard 5
5
Standard 6
5
Bibliography
Bibliography includes resources from the course as well as material located by the ePortfolio owner to support their projects and learning.
All are well organized by categories meaningful to the owner, and correctly cited.
Bibliography includes mostly material from the course. Some evidence of references found by owner.
Loosely organized. Most are cited properly, although some are just links to web sites.
Bibliography contains only a few references.
No organization apparent. Little evidence of use of an online tool to cite sources.
5
Mechanics of writing
Clear explanations and well-written text with no spelling or grammar errors.
Text is easy to follow but with some spelling and/or grammar errors.
Some difficulty in understanding text. Use of text-messaging shortcuts. Text not organized on the page in a way that makes leads to clarity. Spelling and grammar errors often apparent.
3
Use of technology in the activities that required the use of technology tools
As evidenced in both the artifact presented and the associated reflection, it is obvious great effort was put into the production of a useful, creative, technology-rich activity. The creator stretched to reach new goals.
As evidenced in both the artifact presented and the associated reflection, it is obvious an attempt was made to try new tools or to use familiar tools more appropriately in the construction of the activity.
As evidenced in both the artifact presented and the associated reflection, little evidence was exhibited that an appropriate use of technology was applied although both an artifact and reflection were present.
Scoring Rubric for ePortfolio
Wiki includes home page, pages for all standards, bibliography, and navigation bar.
Table of Contents on each page.
Evidence apparent throughout the wiki of use of wiki tools such as linking, adding images, formatting text, addition of tables, embedding media, etc.
Wiki is attractive, and used basic text editing only.
Some difficulty evident with wiki editing and “look” or wiki.
Introduction of self includes rich information about the creator.
Some information about creator.
Includes references to competencies achieved for each module.
Goal
At end of course, achievements listed and explained with examples. References to frameworks included in setting clear goals for next steps given.
At end of course, some achievements listed, but only some deep thought evident.
At end of course, little connection made between course work and next steps in setting goals.
Integration Plan
Links connect the activity with the standard.
In-depth reflection on how each artifact demonstrated how the standard was met.
Clear goals set for future learning related to each standard.
Some artifacts from course assignments missing. Some links missing so artifact is un-viewable.
Perfunctory goals set although some standards have well-thought-out goals.
Goals were not well thought out, and have little possibility of being met.
All are well organized by categories meaningful to the owner, and correctly cited.
Loosely organized. Most are cited properly, although some are just links to web sites.
No organization apparent. Little evidence of use of an online tool to cite sources.